open access
Oncology Therapeutics and Drug Development

Peer-Reviewed Bi-Annual (Two issues per year)
×

Contact Emails

cancerjournal@globalmeetx.net
support@globalmeetx.com
editorial@globalmeetx.com
finance@globalmeetx.com
Current Approaches to Small Renal Masses: Active Surveillance vs Ablation vs Partial Nephrectomy - A Narrative Review
Mini Review - Volume: 1, Issue: 1, 2026 (February)

Christos Diamantopoulos1*, Dimitrios Thanatopoulos2, Anastasios Fentas2, Sampson Panagiotidis3 and Evangelos Varelas4

1Department of Urology, General Hospital of Katerini, Greece
2Urology Department of Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece
3Department of Urology, General Hospital of Veroia, Greece
4Department of Urology, General Hospital of Edessa, Greece

*Correspondence to: Christos Diamantopoulos, Department of Urology, General Hospital of Katerini, Greece, E-mail:

Received: December 14, 2025; Manuscript No: JODD-25-5479; Editor Assigned: December 18, 2025; PreQc No: JODD-25-5479 (PQ); Reviewed: December 29, 2025; Revised: January 22, 2026; Manuscript No: JODD-25-5479 (R); Published: February 09, 2026

ABSTRACT

The increasing use of cross-sectional imaging has resulted in a rising incidence of incidentally detected small renal masses (SRMs), defined as enhancing renal tumors ≤4 cm. Management has evolved from routine surgery to individualized, risk-based strategies.

Methods: A structured narrative review was performed following PRISMA-aligned principles. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients with SRMs managed by active surveillance (AS), partial nephrectomy (PN), or percutaneous thermal ablation. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria and were synthesized qualitatively.

Results: SRMs generally demonstrate slow growth kinetics, with mean growth rates of approximately 0.25–0.3 cm/year, and the risk of metastatic progression during AS remains low (<3%) in appropriately selected patients. PN provides excellent long- term oncologic control and superior renal function preservation and remains the preferred treatment for surgically fit patients. Thermal ablation offers a minimally invasive alternative with favorable functional outcomes and acceptable oncologic control, although local recurrence rates are slightly higher than with PN.

Conclusions: Management of SRMs should be individualized according to patient comorbidity, tumor characteristics, and life expectancy. AS, thermal ablation, and PN each represent valid treatment strategies, and shared decision-making is essential to optimize outcomes.

Keywords: Small Renal Mass; Active Surveillance; Partial Nephrectomy; Thermal Ablation; Renal Cell Carcinoma


Citation: Diamantopoulos C, Thanatopoulos D, Fentas A, Panagiotidis S, Varelas E (2026). Current Approaches to Small Renal Masses: Active Surveillance vs Ablation vs Partial Nephrectomy - A Narrative Review. Oncol. Ther. Drug Dev.. Vol.1 Iss.1, February (2026), pp:1-5.
Copyright: © 2026 Christos Diamantopoulos, Dimitrios Thanatopoulos, Anastasios Fentas, Sampson Panagiotidis, Evangelos Varelas. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.